Kanjama faces backlash over abduction remarks

Law Society of Kenya president-elect Charles Kanjama is facing intense online criticism for his cautious response to public concerns over alleged abductions and threats to civil liberties.

The controversy gained momentum after the Directorate of Criminal Investigations detained content creator Peter Maingi Kimani, widely known as Menelik Kimani. Authorities took him into custody over a viral TikTok video deemed threatening. Kimani was released soon after, but the incident revived widespread alarm about enforced disappearances and a perceived clampdown on dissent across Kenya.

Social media users pressed Kanjama, who is due to assume office on 27 March, to condemn such cases more strongly. Many accused the incoming leader of remaining too reserved amid declining trust in state institutions.

Kanjama defends his current role

Kanjama responded by stressing he holds no executive authority until the formal handover. Expectations are fair, he said, and he intends to act decisively once sworn in. Asking him to function as president before taking office is unrealistic, he added in online posts.

The explanation drew further ire. Critics claimed it implied victims should simply wait or report incidents to agencies potentially involved. One viral remark mocked the suggestion: report an abduction to the abductor.

Kanjama clarified his comments had been misinterpreted. He noted the current Law Society of Kenya leadership remains responsible and directed people toward the existing Public Interest Committee and relevant contacts. Proper channels, he argued, are essential for real accountability.

He criticised persistent cynicism, calling some detractors cynics and prophets of doom. Such relentless negativity, he warned, could unintentionally bolster those accused of violating the rule of law. Extreme cynicism helps the oppressors, he stated. Focus on the core issues instead.

Kanjama maintained that efforts to undermine him pre-office would damage the Law Society of Kenya itself. Attacking the incoming president benefits no one—it is like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

On abductions, Kanjama expressed understanding. Kenyans are exhausted by these ongoing disappearances, he acknowledged. The society must continue raising alarms until they end. Stopping them ranks as a major priority for his leadership.

Until 27 March, however, his role stays advisory. He advised those affected to report to the Directorate of Criminal Investigations and National Police Service, inform media outlets, and contact organisations including Amnesty Kenya, Kenya Human Rights Commission and Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, alongside the current Law Society of Kenya team.

Kanjama also touched on a recent passport issue impacting some Kenyans’ international travel. He pledged effective solutions within his first 100 days and called for patience with the sitting leadership in the interim.

The sharp online exchanges have placed Kanjama under rare pre-office scrutiny. Lawyers elected him with strong confidence, and he vows bold leadership once in position.

As 27 March nears, observers watch closely. Will his commitments lead to firm steps on abductions, free expression and rights protection? The transition period will reveal much.