Uganda court nullifies controversial online speech law
March 17, 2026
2 min read
The Constitutional Court has nullified the controversial Computer Misuse Amendment Act 2022 citing major procedural violations during its passage by Parliament. Photo credit: X.com/afrovertize
Uganda’s Constitutional Court has declared the controversial Computer Misuse (Amendment) Act, 2022 — widely known as the “Nsereko Bill” — null and void, dealing a major blow to government efforts to restrict online expression.
Journalists, activists and civil society groups had challenged the legislation, which criminalized the sharing of “false, misleading or unsolicited” online information. Offenders faced up to five years in prison, provisions critics said were vague and ripe for abuse against dissenters.
Prominent petitioners included journalist Agather Atuhaire, Lillian Drabo and organizations such as the African Centre for Media Excellence. They contended the law was designed to silence critics rather than curb genuine online harms. Lawyer George Musisi described the decision as “a significant blow against curbs on free expression.”
Atuhaire praised MP Gorreth Namugga’s earlier parliamentary stand against the bill and hailed the ruling as an important procedural win that upholds parliamentary rules and constitutional safeguards.
Petitioners are now seeking the immediate release of individuals charged under the law and possible compensation. The government has not yet issued an official response to the judgment.
The Act, introduced by Kampala Central MP Muhammad Nsereko, amended the 2011 Computer Misuse Act to target hate speech, malicious information and unauthorized sharing of children’s data. Rights groups had warned it would stifle journalism, civic discourse and electronic commerce.
This ruling echoes earlier court decisions striking down overly broad provisions in cyber laws, reinforcing judicial oversight on legislation affecting fundamental rights.
What it means for Uganda’s digital landscape
Analysts view the outcome as a boost for media freedom in a country where online speech has faced increasing scrutiny. It sends a clear message that procedural shortcuts in lawmaking will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.
Civil society groups expressed hope that the decision will deter future attempts to impose similar restrictions. However, observers caution that other provisions in existing cyber laws remain in force and could still be used selectively.
The full judgment is expected to provide further guidance on the scope of the nullification and next steps for affected parties.
AGENCIES
